As expected, the NCAA has unveiled notice of the allegations it is lodging against Tennessee’s football and basketball programs.
The notice has been released by the university.
As expected, Bruce Pearl and the basketball program are accused of 94 impermissible phone calls to recruits, impermissible contact with recruits during an unofficial visit (the infamous barbecue at Pearl’s home) and impermissible contact with a recruit at his high school.
Also as expected, Pearl has been charged by the NCAA of unethical conduct, failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance and failure to monitor.
There are no major surprises in the NCAA’s letter.
Lane Kiffin and the football program have been accused of 16 impermissible phone calls to recruits and impermissible contact with recruits. Kiffin has been charged with failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance and failure to monitor.
So, that’s that. Tennessee will appear before the NCAA Committee on Infractions on June 10-11. After that, punishment will be levied. Punishment for the football program should be quite minimal. Punishment for the basketball program will be more severe. One wouldn’t think that a postseason ban is going to be a part of that punishment, but it certainly could (and probably will) include scholarship losses. As for punishment for Pearl, who knows. A best-case scenario is that the NCAA decides the punishment levied already by the university and the SEC is sufficient. A worst-case scenario would be Pearl being suspended for up to a year by the NCAA. One would have to think that the 8-game suspension levied by the SEC and the pay cuts and off-campus recruiting ban levied by UT would cover Pearl on the failure to monitor and failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance charges. It’s that unethical conduct charge for lying that’s going to get him into further trouble, if in fact the NCAA does decide to levy further punishment against him…which seems likely.
Judging what we saw yesterday from the NCAA suspending UConn basketball coach Jim Calhoun, Kiffin could very well face some punishment from the NCAA as well. That will be the only part of all of this that will make UT fans smile, if in fact it does happen.
THE GOOD NEWS
All of that is the bad news. Here’s the good news:
• There is no “lack of institutional control” charge. That’s good news for UT fans. It’s much better news for Athletic Director Mike Hamilton. He might still not survive this, but count me among those who believe he certainly wouldn’t have survived if UT had been slapped with LOIC. It wasn’t really expected, but with all three major men’s programs under scrutiny at once (the baseball program was also part of the investigation but wasn’t charged with violations in this letter), you never know…LOIC would have meant harsher punishments for the university.
• The football program was not cited for failure to monitor. Earlier this month, new media sports guru Clay Travis reported on AOL’s Fanhouse that the program would be cited. As it turns out, only Kiffin was cited. That means the hefty punishment falls on Kiffin, not UT. That’s as it should have been, and that also provides a little more boost to Hamilton because he can say, “Hey, the guy came in here for 13 months and did these things and I had no idea what he was doing.” Will it convince boosters? Trustees? Who knows.
• The baseball program wasn’t cited. Once rumored to be the guiltiest program of all, more recent expectations were that the program would face only one secondary violation. This is good for the program, coach Todd Raleigh and, obviously, Mike Hamilton.
PEARL’S FUTURE
Talking heads continue to ask questions about Pearl’s future at Tennessee. The latest example is Indiana sports blogger Kent Sterling, who again asks the tired old question, “Is Pearl on his way out at Tennessee?”
KNS blogger Michael Silence and I had a nice, short debate a few weeks ago about whether firing Pearl remains an option for Tennessee. Michael’s position is that the fact UT and Pearl still haven’t signed a new contract for Pearl could be a sign that termination is still on the table as an option. My position is that the Hamilton and UT Chancellor Jimmy Cheek have made it very clear that Pearl is their man. By going to bat so publicly for Pearl, that could be seen as nose-thumbing by the NCAA, which would in turn come down a little more harshly on the university. Why would Hammy and Cheek make such bold and potentially inflammatory statements if firing Pearl truly is still an option?
Last week, Hamilton was quoted by the KNS as saying that UT’s intention is to keep Pearl, even if he is suspended for a full year by the NCAA. I think UT has made it clear: the only way Pearl will not be coaching
at Tennessee next year or the year after that is if he decides to go by his own free will.
But what if Mike Hamilton isn’t there? Admittedly, that could change things. If Hamilton doesn’t survive this ordeal, his replacement might not be a Pearl ally. In fact, the school’s trustees and donors could bring in an AD for the sole purpose of cleaning house.
If Pearl is hit with show-cause by the NCAA, that significantly heightens those chances. Show-cause means schools must convince the NCAA that they should be allowed to hire a coach before actually hiring him, but it’s basically a blacklist from coaching. Former Oklahoma and Indiana coach Kelvin Sampson is the most notable basketball coach to be hit with a show-cause order.
It remains very plausible that Pearl could be hit with show-cause. Consider Todd Bozeman, the former head coach at Cal. He was slapped with an 8-year show cause order in 1996 after lying to the NCAA about paying for a player’s parents to attend games. And, yesterday, the NCAA hit UConn assistant Beau Archibald with show-cause for lying during the course of that investigation.
Both men accused of lying to the NCAA, both hit with show-cause. Pearl also lied. Of course, both of those men’s transgressions were more severe. In Bozeman’s case, he paid $30,000 to a player’s parents. Pearl just hosted a kid at a barbecue. In Archibald’s case, he lied to investigators twice and didn’t come back and make it straight. Pearl lied once (as far as we know), then went back and set the record straight.
But the NCAA hit Archibald with show-cause after he had already been forced to resign from UConn. Pearl has not been forced to resign from Tennessee.
Interesting times are ahead. If Pearl is slapped with a hefty suspension plus show-cause, maybe he doesn’t survive. Anything less than that and he’ll be coaching this team as long as he wishes.