On July 1, the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency will officially enter “wind-down” mode, as it prepares to be dissolved.
Twelve months later — July 1, 2012 — the agency will cease to exist, unless the Tennessee General Assembly takes steps between now and then to make sure that doesn’t happen. House Speaker Beth Harwell, R-Nashville, has guaranteed that such steps will be taken when the legislature reconvenes in January. Other members of the House aren’t so sure.
The Tennessean had the entire breakdown yesterday.
The state Senate passed a 5-year extension for the TWRA this session, keeping the agency in operation through 2016. The legislation’s companion bill in the House was bottled up in committee, however, and never reached the floor for a full vote. The reason? Governmental Operations Committee Chairman Jim Cobb, R-Johnson City, didn’t allow a vote on it in committee, because he says he wants to force the agency and its 13-member governing commission to sit down for talks with lawmakers.
Cobb is apparently upset that he hasn’t been included in talks between TWRA and some lawmakers over the past couple of years. The Tennessean quotes Rep. Frank Nicely, R-Knoxville, as saying that a relative of Cobb’s was fined by TWRA for hunting over bait…a charge he apparently feels was erroneous. For his part, Niceley is no stranger to controversy involving TWRA. He’s had a number of complaints in recent years, including minor game violations against friends and, more recently, TWRA’s opposition to a failed deer farming bill, which Nicely authored.
Mike Butler, CEO of the Tennessee Wildlife Federation, a non-profit conservation lobbying organization often allied with TWRA, says those complaints shouldn’t be significant enough to jeopardize an agency that drives $2.4 billion annually into Tennessee’s economy.
Hunting and fishing, and the accompanying economic benefits, will continue even if TWRA ceases to exist. So Butler’s stance involves a bit of hyperbole. But the premise of what he’s saying is true enough: TWRA manages Tennessee’s fish and wildlife, hunting and fishing seasons, and enforces the laws governing those sports. The agency does that somewhat uniquely in that it is the only state agency that is self-sustaining. Tax dollars do not fund TWRA, and TWRA does not need the approval of the state’s lawmakers to set season dates and bag limits.
That has long rankled a number of lawmakers, some because they abhor the notion that the agency doesn’t need the legislature’s stamp of approval to tell hunters how many deer they can shoot and others because they would like to dip their hands into the agency’s coffers. The Tennessee Wildlife Resources Commission can be quite political — it is composed of appointees by the governor and selects its own chairman — but not nearly as political as the alternative…which would be to require hunting seasons, bag limits and other wildlife decisions to be approved by the legislature.
Those decisi ons are best left in the hands of folks who deal with them
on a daily basis, not legislators who have political interests at heart.
But all that is neither here nor there, really. The fact is that the legislature can restructure TWRA anytime it chooses, with enough support in the House and Senate. The issue here is one of lawmakers attempting to politically strong-arm the agency because of petty beefs they have with the way the agency does things.
It’s been just one year since the last time TWRA found itself on the verge of sunsetting because a lawmaker used tactics similar to what Cobb has attempted this year. Last year, it was then-Speaker of the House Kent Williams, R-Carter County, who was playing games with TWRA. Williams asked Rep. Susan Lynn to take the bill concerning the TWRA extension off notice in 2010, again in an effort to force communication between the agency and lawmakers.
Williams said at the time that it was only coincidence that Rep. Chad Faulkner, R-Campbell County, had a beef with TWRA over bass regulations on Norris Lake; his issue with TWRA had nothing to do with fishing regs, he said.
Taking action to dissolve TWRA would be a huge mistake on the part of lawmakers. But if they’re determined to do that, put it before a vote of the full House and the full Senate. These strong-armed political games of stalling legislation in committees are nonsensical and a waste of the people’s time by the folks who are elected to be responsible for the public’s welfare.
Using the threat of allowing the TWRA to sunset every time a lawmaker has a petty concern with TWRA is equally ridiculous.