For a generation, some things in life have been certain: the rising sun, paying taxes, death…and Tennessee beating Kentucky. Even in years when Kentucky fielded its best teams (2007), even in years when Tennessee fielded its worst (2008), the Vols found a way to beat the SEC East’s doormat.
For 9,863 days, Tennessee owned Kentucky.
But with bowl eligibility β and the opportunity to avoid back-to-back losing years for the first time in one hundred years β riding on the line, Tennessee couldn’t continue the streak. Playing a Kentucky team that was using a wide receiver at quarterback and running a variation of the old wing-T offense almost exclusively β with a University of Tennessee retread calling the shots on offense β the Vols themselves became the doormat of the East, losing 10-7 and slipping into last place in the conference with a 1-7 record.
Tennessee bought out North Carolina, which was scheduled to face the Vols in Neyland Stadium this season, to provide insurance that the team would be able to secure a bowl berth in 2011. As it turns out, the university should have asked SEC commissioner Mike Slive if it could buy out Kentucky.
The loss handed Tennessee its first back-to-back losing seasons since 1910 and 1911. Alex Stone and Z.G. Clevenger β two guys who aren’t exactly a big part of UT football lore β were the coaches in Knoxville in those days.
It was the first time ever for the university to lose seven games in the SEC.
And, with Vanderbilt’s 41-7 win over Wake Forest, the Commodores are eligible for a postseason bowl and the Vols aren’t for just the second time ever.
So, just seven days removed from an inspiring overtime win against Vanderbilt, what happened?
Senior runningback Tauren Poole summed it up like this: “The whole game, no one wanted to be out there.”
That’s disturbing. It’s disturbing because, watching the effort on the field in Lexington, it appeared to be true. Tennessee’s effort was largely uninspired. When you’re playing for bowl eligibility and fighting to keep a 26-year winning streak intact, you hope your players will give it their all.
Apparently that didn’t happen.
“We’re all trying to encourage people because people were out of it,” Poole added. “When it’s like that, you’re not going to be able to execute…the result was what it was.”
And that summed up the second year of what is looking increasingly likely to be a short-lived Derek Dooley era.
To be fair, Tennessee has had a tough go of it this season. Dooley’s luck couldn’t be much worse. At (almost) full strength, Tennessee pounded a pretty good Cincinnati team at Neyland Stadium back in September, defeating the Bearcats 45-23.
The next week, Justin Hunter β who could very well have played his way into mention as a preseason hopeful for the 2012 Heisman Trophy β was lost for the season at Florida, and Tennessee’s season was on the ropes.
Two weeks after that, quarterback Tyler Bray went out with a broken thumb. He would miss half the season before returning against Vanderbilt.
The Vols were already playing without their best defensive player β defensive back Janzen Jackson, who was dismissed shortly before the season opener against Buffalo. Herman Lathers, the anchor of the Vols’ linebacking corps, had already gone down with a fractured ankle and would miss the season.
There were other injuries along the way, but those were the most critical ones.
Those were enough.
Imagine Alabama, which will play for the national championship in early January, without quarterback A.J. McCarron, running back Trent Richardson, linebacker Courtney Upshaw or safety Robert Lester. Would the Crimson Tide have been in contention for the SEC championship, let alone the national championship?
Imagine Georgia, which won the SEC East and will play for the conference championship in Atlanta next week, without quarterback Aaron Murray, runningback Isaiah Crowell, linebacker Jarvis Jones or cornerback Brandon Boykin. Would the Bulldogs have been in contention for the SEC East? Would the Bulldogs have even been bowl eligible?
If those teams couldn’t survive those losses with their whole and experienced rosters, how can a team like Tennessee β still playing with an incomplete and very green roster β expect to overcome such serious losses?
Even healthy, Tennessee was expected to be no better than an 8-4 team this season. Can we safely assume that a team with Bray, Hunter, Lathers and Jackson for all 12 games would have won three more games?
Yes, it’s been a tough go of it. Injuries compounded an already tough task by Dooley, who inherited a team in 2010 that was seriously depleted. The longevity of the Phillip Fulmer era, the Lane Kiffin experiment, and Mike Hamilton’s ineptness as athletics director all combined to leave the cupboard rather bare.
So bare that as recently as Oct. 16, while already beginning to have my doubts about Dooley’s hopes of leading the Vols out of the wilderness and back to college football’s promised land, I opined that he had to have more time β at least two more years.
That opinion was based on the presumption that Tennessee would lose games because of its depth issues. Even when healthy, the Vols were perilously short on depth. An unhealthy, banged up Tennessee team was always going to face an uphill struggle for bowl eligibility.
Six weeks later, my opinion on Dooley has done nearly a 180. But it has nothing to do with wins and losses. Given the nature of the injuries, 5-7 isn’t terrible. Bowl eligibility is great, but let’s face it: Nashville in January isn’t exactly awe-inspiring for a Tennessee program that still has the taste of sugar and oranges and Tostitos in its mouth from years past.
Instead, my opinion of Dooley is based on what appears to be a pattern of mismanagement of the football team.
I was a fan of the Dooley hire even when he was still at Louisiana Tech and before Tennessee’s talks with David Cutcliffe had fallen through. Given the circumstances, I thought it was a good hire. A high-risk hire, sure. But a good one.
Dooley’s introductory press conference went well. When he managed to salvage a good recruiting class from the Lane Kiffin debacle with just a few short weeks to work with, his hire looked even better. And when his team and staff conducted themselves with integrity that was lacking from Kiffin’s short era on campus β while becoming bowl eligible β last season, it looked better still.
I was convinced after the 2010 season ended with a gut-wrenching loss to North Carolina in the Music City Bowl that Dooley would be the guy to get Tennessee back to a BCS bowl for the first time since 1998.
And just so we’re clear, I like Derek Dooley. He’s a man of integrity at a time when Tennessee sorely needs a man of integrity to steady the ship. He gives one of the best press conferences in college football, even if the whole throw-the-players-under-the-bus-and-put-a-comical-twist-on-it routine is becoming a bit stale. And he’s a Southern gentleman with pure Southern football blood running through his veins β the very makings of an iconic Southern football coach, in other words. I wantΒ him to succeed at Tennessee, even now.
It’s just that I no longer have confidence that he canΒ succeed here. That confidence has been dwindling since the Florida game and was pretty much completely used up by the Arkansas game.
In hindsight, there were red flags well before this season’s debacle began. When Tennessee lost at LSU last season β snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in a game that the Vols deserved to win and LSU deserved to lose β the loss came because Tennessee’s defense didn’t have a clue who was supposed to be on the field. Instead of 11 players on the field when LSU ran its final play β a mangled effort at clock management in typical Les Miles fashion that resulted in a bad snap and appeared to end the game β the Vols had 14. The redoux went to LSU.
Instead of blaming coaches, Dooley blamed the officials. They should have stood over the ball and prevented the snap until Tennessee had a chance to respond to LSU’s substitutions, Dooley said.
And, technically, he was right. The officials messed up.
But would Tennessee have been able to get the right players on the field even with more time?
If the 2011 season is any indication, probably not.
Throughout this season, Tennessee has repeatedly been forced to burn timeouts because the wrong players were on the field, or because the offense couldn’t get lined up correctly. Issues that should have been resolved in the first couple of weeks, against Buffalo or Cincy, were still rearing their ugly heads at season’s end, against Arkansas and Vandy.
And that’s where the biggest issues with the Vols’ coaching staff lie.
The improvements β or lack thereof β weren’t limited to the part of the game plan that deals with getting personnel on or off the field. And in many areas, the Vols actually appeared to regress.
Tennessee’s running game, non-existent in wins over Buffalo and Cincinnati to open the season, was still non-existent against Vanderbilt and Kentucky. Tauren Poole went from a 1,000-yard season in 2010 to a lackluster senior season in 2011. Marlon Lane, a freshman, never emerged as the kind of back UT hoped he would become.
Tennessee’s offensive line, bad against the run but pretty good against the pass in the first couple of games of the season, was still bad against the run against Kentucky, and twice gave up sacks in the face of a three-man rush.
Devrin Young, a local kid who appeared poised to become something of a football cult hero after injecting a bit of life into the Vols’ flailing special teams play, disappeared in the second half of the season.
Mychal Rivera, who emerged as a valuable target at tight end, also disappeared by the end of the season.
Tennessee’s receivers β a highly-touted unit with lots of potential if little experience β were average at best after the loss of Hunter. Da’Rick Rogers came on to lead the SEC with 60+ catches, but had costly drops throughout the season. A dropped touchdown pass against South Carolina changed the course of that game. DeAnthony Arnett never really came into his own. Matt Milton, a Β 4-star sophomore, wound up being suspended indefinitely before the Kentucky game.
The defense β employing the bend-but-don’t-break style of its coordinator, Justin Wilcox β was solid but not spectacular, getting burned for big plays at inopportune times and failing to create enough turnovers to help the Vols win games when their offense couldn’t assemble lengthy drives with their top two playmakers out.
Most troubling, though, was Dooley’s inability to rally his team. Young, inexperienced, shorthanded…those were all apt descriptions of the 2011 Vols. Unfortunately, “over-achieving” wasn’t one.
And that’s what separates average coaches from great β even good β coaches: the ability to inspire a team to play above itself. Look around the college football landscape and you’ll find examples of teams that have done just that. A team of 3-star athletes β with a few 4-star and perhaps a 5-star or two sprinkled in β hanging with the big boys and even beating a few of them. Chris Petersen does it with regularity at Boise State. Randy Edsall has done it at Connecticut. Tommy Tuberville used to do it often at Auburn (and did it again this year at Texas Tech).
Dooley’s team has yet to beat a team it wasn’t expected to beat. Often times, the Vols have looked great against teams for a half (Alabama this year; Florida and Alabama last year) before falling apart in the second half.
But the second half has been a different story. Whether other teams have made adjustments Tennessee couldn’t make, or an outmanned Tennessee team has simply gotten worn down, and it’s probably a combination of the two, the Vols have simply not been able to sustain themselves in the second half.
Too often, though, the issue appeared to be a matter of not enough want-to. Like this year’s shellacking at Arkansas. As the Razorbacks poured on the points, Tennessee simply quit on Dooley. It was the same thing that happened against Oregon in 2010, another of those early red flags that most people didn’t pay much attention to at the time.
And against Kentucky, Tennessee never even really showed up, even with quite a bit riding on the line.
The writing is on the wall: Derek Dooley is not the guy who can get it done at Tennessee. Even if he was, the deck is now stacked against him, because he has lost a significant portion of the fan base.
Apathy was already present among Tennessee fans. The Vols failed to sell out most of their games this season. The bad economy was part of it; empty seats were part of college football stadiums throughout the land. But teams like Georgia and Alabama were still selling out their stadiums while Tennessee was struggling to avoid thousands of empty seats by hiring a new promotion firm to handle ticket sales.
And that was when bowl eligibility β and, theoretically, SEC East championship hopes β were still in play.
Tennessee fans don’t ask much from their head coach: 1.) Don’t eat your young, 2.) Beat Kentucky.
If Dooley’s job was hard already, imagine him trying to do it with his head on the chopping block and more than half of the UT fan base waiting on β and wanting β the axe to fall.
That’s where Dooley is as early preparations for the 2012 season begin. He managed to avoid the hot seat by eeking out an overtime win against Vandy, then went and firmly planted his posterior in the seat by doing the unthinkable β losing to a team that Tennessee hadn’t lost to since a decade before many of its current players were even born.
Even before Tennessee officially named Dooley its head coach, an ESPN radio analyst who has followed Dooley’s career opined that Dooley is an excellent manager but his X’s and O’s are questionable.
Indeed, that’s how his short tenure at Tennessee has played out. He had the foresight to go after lesser-known recruits who would be more likely to sign with a program that has been mired in mediocrity for the better part of a decade and who would restore the program’s character. And Dooley β who referred little-known defensive coordinators Will Muschamp (now head coach at Florida) and Kirby Smart (soon to be a head coach somewhere) to Nick Saban while serving as an assistant on Saban’s staff β had the wherewithal to bring in some good coaches to join his staff. Certainly not all of them were good choices β offensive line coach Harry Hiestand should be fired as soon as possible, while the jury is still very much out on wide receivers coach Henry Baggett, tight end coach Eric Russell and even offensive coordinator Jim Chaney, a holdover from the Kiffin staff β but former Boise State defensive coordinator Justin Wilcox was a great hire for Dooley, and Darin Hinshaw appears to have been a good hire as quarterbacks coach. Lance Thompson, another Kiffin holdover, was an obvious choice for the DL, while linebackers coach Peter Sirmon also appears to have been a great hire.
But the X’s and O’s? Well, those speak for themselves, at this point.
So why should Tennessee fire Dooley? The problems with X’s and O’s, the inability to coach up the team, the apparent problems with prepping before games and adjusting amid games all add up to a very short tenure in Knoxville for Dooley. As one Vol fan aptly put it, “The SEC is not a forgiving training ground for a guy to slowly warm up to being a head coach.”
If that’s the inevitability, why prolong it? Fan apathy is already at an all-time high, which is costing UT money and the type of big-name recruits that can put the program back on the map. None of today’s high school players remember the last time Tennessee won the SEC. With the improved coaches in this league, the fertile outside recruiting grounds that the Vols have always been forced to rely upon without an abundance of prep football talent in the Volunteer State are drying up. And the SEC is set to become even more competitive with the addition of Texas A&M and Missouri. Programs that aren’t assertive and aggressive will quickly be left in the dirt. Mississippi State learned that, and that’s why they spent more money than any other team β relative to their overall football earnings β to hire a big-name coach.
In other words, Tennessee can’t afford to spend a few years swinging and missing while it searches for a coach who can rebuild the program.
Hamilton struggled to hire a coach to replace Fulmer, and struggled even more to find Kiffin’s replacement. But the program isn’t nearly as much in shambles now as it was just two years ago. For that, Dooley deserves a lot of credit. As a fan said a couple of days ago, “Dooley was the right guy at the time…he just isn’t the guy to lead the program all the way back.” Tennessee has lots of young talent in the fold and it should be an easier sell now than it was then. Plus, going after the little-known guy was Hamilton’s style. There’s no reason to think new AD Dave Hart won’t take a more aggressive approach, and Tennessee can afford to open its pocket book to throw more money at a head coach than it was willing to throw when both Kiffin and Dooley were hired.
As several of the growing legion of UT fans who are disgruntled with Tennessee’s coaching situation have said, “you can’t afford to make a change this quick unless there’s a sure-thing waiting to come coach at Tennessee.” Alabama got a sure thing when it made a coaching change and went after Nick Saban. But this isn’t Alabama and there aren’t any Nick Sabans out there waiting to put down roots in East Tennessee.
And then there’s the other hand . . .
Dooley isn’t going to be fired now. Probably not, anyway; with a new athletic director, one never knows. But Tennessee really can’t afford to fire him and start searching for a new coach now. The Vols are just starting to recover from the ill-effects of Fulmer’s poor recruiting at the end of his tenure and the attrition of the Kiffin experiment. Another coaching search at this point would set the program back too far. Let’s say you fire Dooley and experience the same attrition suffered when Kiffin abandoned ship. The 2012 recruiting class would likely be a wash and it would be at least 2014 before the Vols would have any hopes of seriously competing for an SEC championship game berth.
And that’s probably the one thing that will save Dooley’s job…for now. But he’ll be a lame duck coach. Because if he doesn’t win eight games in 2012, he’ll almost certainly be fired.
And he almost certainly should be.